首頁 »
2011/09/07

工作日誌:TaipeiTimes的採訪報導

新台灣國策智庫採訪通知「組織再造」
一、時間:9/6上午9:30
二、地點:智庫第一會議室
三、主持人:吳榮義 智庫董事長
四、與談人:
陳朝建:銘傳大學公共事務學系助理教授
陳耀祥:台北大學公共行政暨政策學系助理教授
許志雄:嘉義大學公共行政與政策研究所教授
田秋堇:立法委員

以下引述TaipeiTimes的採訪報導(2011.09.07)......


Government reform scheme criticized

INEFFECTUAL:The proposal to trim the Cabinet from 37 ministries and councils and limit staff numbers is ill-judged and insufficient, several academics told a forumBy Chris Wang / Staff Reporter

President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration did not spend enough effort on the impending reorganization of the Executive Yuan, nor present the right vision for the plan, academics said at a forum in Taipei yesterday.

The biggest-ever overhaul of the government is due to begin on Jan. 1, aimed at streamlining government agencies and revitalizing the Executive Yuan.

Under the plan, the number of ministries and councils will be trimmed from 37 to 29; government functions will be re-evaluated and human resources reallocated and personnel numbers capped.

Taiwan Brain Trust chairman Wu Rong-i (吳榮義) said the program’s measures and goals violated the spirit of “re-organization” because the reform plan has been nothing but talk and election promotion, which could cause irreversible damage.

The current plan cut the number of ministries and councils from 37 to 29, which is still a large number compared with other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, most of which have about 20 government agencies, Ming Chuan University professor Chen Chao-chien (陳朝建) said at the forum hosted by the Taiwan Brain Trust.

The reform also failed to identify the function of each agency and make appropriate integration, Chen added.

For example, he said, the Oversea Compatriot Affairs Commission should be merged with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Veterans Affairs Commission would be better off if it was merged into either the Ministry of National Defense or the Ministry of the Interior.

Under the current proposal, agencies that should be independent, such as the central bank and the Financial Supervisory Commission, will be placed under the Executive Yuan, Chen said.

“Only five agencies — the Ministry of Justice, the Hakka Affairs Commission, the central bank, the National Palace Museum and the Central Election Committee — will be reorganized in January, while the rest of the restructuring will be put on hold,” said Chen Yaw-shyang (陳耀祥), a professor of public administration and policy at National Taipei University.

One major problem is the organization laws of dozens of agencies have not yet been passed by the legislature.

“It seems to me that all government agencies and officials are now busy with the upcoming elections and nothing else matters to them,” he said.

The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) could not carry out its planned administrative reorganization when it was in power between 2000 to 2008 because it did not have a legislative majority, said Hsu Chih-hsiung (許志雄), a professor at National Chiayi University.

Ma and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) have a legislative majority, but they have failed to take the time to properly formulate an important policy, Hsu said.

“They only want to list [the reorganization] as one of their accomplishments so they can promote this during the election campaign,” Hsu said.

Judging from the failed effort in the past three years to establish a ministry of energy, the reform plan appears too conservative to help Taiwan adjust to fast-changing global trends, DPP Legislator Tien Chiu-chin (田秋堇) said.

另聯合新聞網有關陳朝建談及政府組織再造的新聞報導(影音檔)

http://video.udn.com/video/Item/ItemPage.do?sno=324-233-2F3b3-2F304-233-2B333430333-2F4-2334

-------補充--------
組織再造 學者抨無法發揮綜效鉅亨網新聞中心 (來源:中廣新聞網) 2011-09-06 20:07 

為了讓政府部門「瘦身」,政府組織再造規劃將現有的三十七個部會整併成二十九個,行政院日前公布明年元旦起第一波整併的部會,包括法務部、客家事務委員會、央行、故宮和中選會。

為了讓政府部門「瘦身」,政府組織再造規劃將現有的三十七個部會整併成二十九個,行政院日前公布明年元旦起第一波整併的部會,包括法務部、客家事務委員會、央行、故宮和中選會。

銘傳大學公共事務學系助理教授「陳朝建」,和台北大學公共行政暨政策學系助理教授「陳耀祥」,今天在新台灣國策智庫指出,按現有規劃,整併後的部會數量仍然過多,「部」和「會」的定位和功能混淆,難以發揮綜效;對獨立機關的設計不良,仍然無法真正獨立。


工作日誌:遠見雜誌的訪談報導 ←上一篇 │首頁│ 下一篇→工作日誌:Wall Street Journal的引述報導
本文引用網址: